چرچل نازی —– دھشت گرد چرچل —– چرچل چوروں اور شیکسپیئر چوروں نے پانچ سو سالوں میں ، صرف ھندوستان سے پانچ ھزار ٹریلیئن یورو چوری کیئے

ABOVE PICTURE ——- Mr. Dadabhai Norooji, an Indian Writer of the 19th & 20th Centuries, lived in Nazi Britain & Churchill Thief Britain, during the time of the Brutal British Colonial Terrorism in India

He wrote the Undermentioned TWO English Books, detailing the total amount of 5,000 Trillion Euros, (in today’s money) which the British Thieves mercilessly plundered from the hard working Indians, during their 500 years long “Barbaric British Colonial Terrorism in India”

500 years ago, INDIA was the Richest country of the world & now, it is the most impoverished

HOW did this happen ?

The Answer is very very very simple

INDIA is poor, because the Churchill Thieves (British Thieves) Looted 5,000 Trillion Euros from INDIA in 500 years

Poverty in India_Dadabhai

Poverty & Un-British Rule in India

Poverty & Un-British Rule in India-1

چرچل نازی —– دھشت گرد چرچل —– چرچل چوروں اور شیکسپیئر چوروں نے پانچ سو سالوں میں ، صرف ھندوستان سے پانچ ھزار ٹریلیئن یورو چوری کیئے

Churchill Famine in India

VIDEO

of the details of Churchill Loot of India

Churchill Massacre

Garden Massacre in INDIA, 1919

چرچل نازی —– دھشت گرد چرچل —– چرچل چوروں اور شیکسپیئر چوروں نے پانچ سو سالوں میں ، صرف ھندوستان سے پانچ ھزار ٹریلیئن یورو چوری کیئے

David Cameron on Wednesday (February 20) became the first serving British prime minister to voice regret about one of the bloodiest episodes in colonial India, a massacre of unarmed civilians in the city of Amritsar in 1919.

The killings, known in India as the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, were described by Mahatma Gandhi, the father of the Indian independence movement, as having shaken the foundations of the British Empire. A group of soldiers opened fire on an unarmed crowd without warning in the northern Indian city after a period of unrest, killing hundreds in cold blood.

Cameron’s visit and expression of regret for what happened stopped short of an apology – but made it clear he considers the episode a stain on Britain’s past.

Dressed in a dark suit, Cameron laid a wreath at a memorial to the massacre, a terracotta-coloured stone obelisk. He then stood in front of the monument in silence for a few moments.

“I came here to pay my respects and to remember all those innocent people that died. This was a deeply shameful event in British history, one that Winston Churchill, at the time quite rightly said was monstrous. We should never forget what happened here,” Cameron said.

The gesture, coming on the third and final day of a visit to India aimed at drumming up trade and investment, is seen as an attempt to improve relations with Britain’s former colonial possession and to court around 1.5 million British voters of Indian origin ahead of a 2015 election.

Cameron also visited Amritsar’s Golden Temple, Sikhism’s holiest shrine.

The British report into the Amritsar massacre at the time said 379 people had been killed and 1,200 wounded. But a separate inquiry commissioned by the Indian pro-independence movement said around 1,000 people had been killed in the city in Punjab.

Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer, the man who gave the order to fire, explained his decision by saying he felt it was necessary to “teach a moral lesson to the Punjab”.

Some in Britain hailed him “as the man who saved India”, but others condemned him. India became independent in 1947.

Many historians consider the massacre a turning point that undermined British rule of India. It was, they say, one of the moments that caused Gandhi and the pro-independence Indian National Congress movement to lose trust in the British, inspiring them to embark on a path of civil disobedience.

Other British politicians and dignitaries – though no serving prime minister – have expressed regret about the incident before.

In 1920, Winston Churchill, then the Secretary of State for War, called the Amritsar massacre “a monstrous event”, saying it was “not the British way of doing business”.

On a visit to Amritsar in 1997, Queen Elizabeth called it a distressing episode, but said history could not be rewritten. However, her husband, Prince Philip, courted controversy during the visit when he questioned the higher Indian death toll.

Before he became prime minister, Tony Blair also visited, saying the memorial at Amritsar was a reminder of “the worst aspects of colonialism”.

In recent years, British leaders have begun to apologise for some of the excesses of the empire.

Visiting Pakistan in 2011, Cameron angered traditionalists at home saying Britain had caused many of the world’s problems, including the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan.

When in office, Blair apologised for the 19th century Irish potato famine and for Britain’s involvement in the slave trade, while Gordon Brown, his successor, apologised for the fact that British children were shipped to Australia and other Commonwealth countries between the 1920s and 1960s.

India’s colonial history remains a sensitive subject for many Indians, particularly nationalists who want Britain to recognise and apologise for its excesses.

Cameron has said the two countries enjoy a “special relationship”, a term usually reserved for Britain’s relations with the United States.

For now, Britain’s economy is the sixth largest in the world and India’s the 10th. But India is forecast to overtake its old colonial master in the decades ahead and London wants to share in that economic success.